Legal Opinion
United States v. 50 Boxes [OF] ... Cafergot P-B Suppositories
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 1, 1989No. Civ. A. 86-1630-WFPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WOLF, District Judge.
This is an in rem forfeiture action brought by the United States under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDA Act”), 21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq., seeking that the seized defendant drug, Cafer-got P-B Suppository (“CPB Suppository”) be forfeited and destroyed. The complaint alleges that CPB Suppository is a “new drug” within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. § 321(p), which may not be introduced into interstate commerce without Federal Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) approval.
Claimant Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation (“Sandoz” or “claimant”) opposes…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robert C. Hahn v. Francis W. SargentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Simion Stepanischen v. Merchants Despatch Transportation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. 50 Boxes More or Less Etc., Appeal of Sandoz Pharmaceuticals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990