Legal Opinion

Lichtenberg v. Sachs

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 9, 1952No. [No. 163, October Term, 1951.]PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkell, J.

These are appeals from a final decree for an injunction restraining defendants from interfering with the use by plaintiff and the owners and occupiers of certain land of plaintiff of a right of way as now laid out from plaintiff’s land through certain land of defendants to Hammonds Ferry Road. In a full and careful opinion Judge Clark held that plaintiff is entitled to a prescriptive right of way, and to protection by injunction against interference by defendants with use of this right of way. Neither the briefs nor the appendices, nor even the transcript (except Judge Clark’s opinion),…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Smith v. ShiebeckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  2. Albert v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  3. Cox v. ForrestCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  4. Schmidt v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Wells v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Chevy Chase Land Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Moore v. McAllisterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  3. Dalton v. Real Estate & Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Klein v. DoveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  5. Clarke Baridon, Inc. v. Union Asbestos & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API