Legal Opinion

Doreen Chambers, Anthony G. Chambers v. G. D. Searle & Company

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 15, 1977No. 76-1521PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff sued G. D. Searle & Co. (Searle) alleging that as a result of taking an oral contraceptive manufactured and sold by Searle, she had contracted cerebral thrombosis, and that Searle was liable for her injuries on the grounds of fraud, implied warranty, strict liability and negligence. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case, the district court granted Searle’s motion for a directed verdict, ruling, in a carefully considered and thorough opinion, that plaintiff had failed to adduce sufficient evidence to permit a jury to return a verdict in her favor on any one of the four theories…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chambers v. G. D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1975

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Richard Leander Ferebee, Jr. v. Chevron Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. Judith Brochu and Emmanuel T. Brochu v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  3. MacDonald v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Werner v. Upjohn Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  5. Nancy C. Lindsay and Bruce H. Lindsay v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API