Legal Opinion

Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. Ashton

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 27, 1937No. 1567PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover upon a policy of insurance insuring the life of her late husband. Trial by jury was waived and the cause submitted to the court upon the admissions contained in the pleadings and a stipulation of facts. Plaintiff prevailed and defendant appealed.

The policy, issued on March 18, 1926, was a 10-year term contract. It provided that it was issued in consideration of the payment in advance at the home office of the company of an annual premium of $65.-95, a semiannual premium of $33.65, or a quarterly premium of $17.15; and it…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Heinlein v. Imperial Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Priest v. Bankers Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Wolford v. National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Riddle v. RankinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Sebal v. Columbian National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Meier v. New Jersey Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  2. American Nat. Ins. v. Yee Lim SheeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  3. Purvis v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  4. Owen W. Markel, of the Estates of Raymond E. King and Yvonne King, Deceased v. The Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  5. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'n v. WarrellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API