Legal Opinion
CP Solutions PTE, Ltd. v. General Electric Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 27, 2006No. 3:04CV2150 JBAPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT [DOC. # 100]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff CP Solutions PTE, Ltd. (“CPS”), moves to amend its present complaint against defendants General Electric Company, GE Industrial Systems, GE Multilin *536Power Management Lentronics, GE Fanuc Automation North America, and GE Meter (collectively, “GE”) to include reference to its parent corporation, Ultro Technologies, Ltd. (“Ultro”), add certain factual allegations, including new information regarding contract negotiation events prior to January 2003 (which was the time frame previously…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,005 State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corporation and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Cresswell v. Sullivan & CromwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Gargano v. HeymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- United States ex rel. Maritime Administration v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- The STANDARD FIRE INS. CO. v. DonnellyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2010
- Powell v. City of Radcliff, KentuckyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020