Legal Opinion

Churchill v. Woodruff

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1917No. 9,393PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Marion Superior Court (94,964); William W. Thornton, Judge. Action by Ruth Woodruff, by her next friend, Carrie Woodruff, against Omer T. Churchill and William Otto Jones, partners doing business under the firm name of Geneva Laundry. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Ibach, C. J. —

Appellee, a girl seventeen years of age, was injured while employed by appellants in their laundry by having her hand drawn into a mangle. This particular mangle was a machine consisting of a large cylinder and several small rolls set in a frame and so constructed that when in motion the large cylinder turned against and upon the smaller rolls which were placed at fixed intervals around it, the small rolls turning" in an opposite direction, giving the machine an intake feed of great' compression. On one side of the mangle, a short distance above the point of contact of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States Cement Co. v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Picken v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burroughs v. Southern Colonization Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API