Legal Opinion

Robillwayne Corp. v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1966No. Civ. 28440PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFiles, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment declaring that those portions of the Los Angeles Municipal Code which call for the licensing of a “Public Solicitor” are unenforceable against the plaintiffs for the reason that a general law of the state, Business and Professions Code sections 7520 through 7583, has preempted the subject matter. Plaintiffs are a corporation licensed by the state as an insurance adjuster, the company manager who has qualified as such under the provisions of the state statute, and three other company employees. The city is the sole defendant.

The action was tried on plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Agnew v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Northern California Psychiatric Society v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. People v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Tri County Apartment Ass'n v. City of Mountain ViewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Stewart v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Maloy v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API