Legal Opinion

Town of Hartsville v. McCall

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 8, 1915No. 9116PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before Gary, J., Darlington, The defendant, E. B. McCall, was convicted in a municipal Court of a misdemeanor, and the judgment reversed on appeal to the Circuit Court. Erom the judgment of the Circuit Court, the town appeals. cites: 147 Ky. 536; 33 L. R. A. (N. S.) 331; 92 Ga. 41; 22 L. R. A. 248; 95 Mo. 402; 19 B. R. A. 775; 44 Am. St. Rep. 75, 79; 40 S. C. 221; 2 N. & McC. 27; lb. 34; 3 Hill 94.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydricic.

The respondent, McCall, resides and his place of business is outside the limits of the town of Hartsville. He ordered three gallons of whiskey from Richmond, Va., which the testimony tends to prove, and the triál jury found, was for unlawful use. On arrival of the whiskey at the express office within the town, McCall sent a written order to the express company to deliver it to R. R. Bain, who received it and put it in a dray. The drayman carried it to McCall’s store, outside the limits of the town, and delivered it to him, and he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tutt v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. State v. MorrowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Charleston v. JenkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  2. State v. SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API