Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Barker v. Barker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 2013No. COA12-1551Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDillon, Judge

Because I believe there was competent evidence to support the trial court’s findings regarding Holly’s diligent pursuit of her education, I concur with Section III of the majority’s opinion. However, I do not believe that the trial court’s findings support a conclusion that Defendant’s actions were willful; and, therefore, I dissent from Section IV of the majority’s opinion affirming the trial court’s adjudication of civil contempt against Defendant.

In the case sub judice, the trial court held Defendant in civil contempt because he failed to comply with the Stipulations and Order dated *37020…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walters v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Yount v. LoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Youse v. Duke Energy Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Blevins v. WelchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. DeROSSETT v. DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API