Legal Opinion

Norwood v. Raytheon Co.

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided January 17, 2006No. 2:04-cr-00127PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS ALL MEDICAL MONITORING CLAIMS AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS ASSERTED BY THE BUND ZUR UNTERSTUTZUNG

MARTINEZ, District Judge.

On this day, the Court considered: (1) Defendants Raytheon Company, Lucent Technologies Inc., General Electric Corporation, Honeywell International, Inc., ITT Industries, Inc., and ITT-Gilfillan, Inc.’s (collectively “Defendants”): (a) “Motion to Dismiss All Medical Monitoring Claims” and (b) “Motion to Dismiss All Claims Asserted by the Bund Zur Unterstutzung,” collectively filed 1 on May 4,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  4. Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bell v. 3M Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2018
  2. Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2015
  3. Morris v. Cessna Aircraft Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2011
  4. Guinan v. A.I. Dupont Hospital for ChildrenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API