Legal Opinion

Timmons v. Kelley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 13, 2018No. CV-18-279PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobin F. Wynne, Associate Justice

Appellant Henry Timmons appeals the denial of his pro se petition for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Because it is clear from the record that Timmons's cause of *825action cannot proceed as a matter of law, we affirm.

Our standard of review of a decision to grant or deny a petition to proceed in forma pauperis is abuse of discretion, and the circuit court's factual findings in support of its exercise of discretion will not be reversed unless clearly erroneous. Whitney v. Guterres , 2018 Ark. 133, 2018 WL 1957077, petition for cert. filed (U.S. Aug. 24,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fields v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  2. Philyaw v. KelleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  3. The Ballard Grp. Inc. v. BP Lubricants USA Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  4. Renshaw v. NorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Cloird v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Russell Berger v. Bill Bryant, Director, Arkansas State PoliceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
  2. Shawn T. Rainer v. Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  3. Shawn Trevell Rainer v. Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
  4. Fredrick D. Mason v. Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API