Murray v. Cedar Rapids City Lines, Inc.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The case was tried twice. The first jury disagreed; the second returned a verdict for plaintiff upon which the court entered judgment, overruling defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict. Defendant has appealed.
The basic facts are not seriously in dispute. Defendant operates a city bus system in Cedar Rapids. On May 16, 1946, at about ten p.m., plaintiff conefededly became a passenger on one of its buses and sat opposite the rear door. This was at First Avenue and Second Street. He continued on the bus until it reached the point where the injury occurred, on Fourth Avenue where…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Weber v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Chesley v. Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- McBroom v. S. E. Greyhound LinesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
- Fitzgerald v. Des Moines City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Kliebenstein v. Iowa Railway & Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rozmajzl v. Northland Greyhound LinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- Barnard v. Cedar Rapids City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- Burton v. Des Moines Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Letsos v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Fanelli v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.