Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Village of Pinehurst

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 3, 1990No. 8910UC825PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

We note at the outset that the Village, in violation of N.C. R. App. P., Rule 28, has presented its arguments in the brief without any reference whatsoever to assignments of error pertinent to the questions. The Village’s appeal is therefore subject to dismissal. Because this appeal presents important questions of public interest, we exercise our discretionary authority pursuant to N.C. R. App. P., Rule 2, and proceed to an examination of the merits of the Village’s appeal.

I. General Standards of Review

The standards which govern the review of a determination of the North Carolina…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Public Staff-North Carolina Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Associated Petroleum CarriersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State ex rel. Utilities Commission, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. v. Estes Express LinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of North Carolina ex rel. Utilities Commission v. WardlawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. In re Petition of Utilities, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. In re: Cube Yadkin GenerationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  4. STATE EX REL. UTIL. COM'N v. PinehurstCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API