Legal Opinion
United States v. Akeem Joseph
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 19, 2013No. 12-3808PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
Lawyers and judges are familiar with the well-worn adage that bad facts make bad law. A possible corollary to this proposition is that good facts make good law. This case is of the latter type, in which straightforward facts present an opportunity to rectify imprecisions in our case law regarding the preservation and waiver of suppression arguments. We must decide the degree of particularity required for a party to preserve a suppression argument for appeal purposes. To determine this, we must clarify our terminology as to what it is parties preserve. We conclude…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Wright v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- United States of America, Appellant/cross No. 88-3268 v. Alan Frank, A/K/A A. Roy, Appellee/cross No. 88-3220Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Huber v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- United States v. BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Lincoln Benefit Life Co. v. AEI Life, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Jane Doe v. Mercy Catholic Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Premier Comp Solutions LLC v. UPMCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Hinkle v. Beckham County Board of CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Federal Trade Commission v. AbbVie IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.