State v. Bolster

OPINION OF THE COURT

James D. Pacones, J.

In this proceeding commenced under Mental Hygiene Law article 10, the record indicates that respondent did not file a notice of removal to the county (Tompkins County) of the underlying criminal sex offense charges according to Mental Hygiene Law § 10.06 (b) after the sex offender civil management petition was filed. The court conducted a hearing on November 30, 2012 pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 10.06 (k). Probable cause was found to exist that the respondent is a sex offender requiring civil management. By order of the same date, the respondent was…