Legal Opinion
Hardiman v. United States
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided February 1, 1989No. Civ. 88-279-DPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVINE, Chief Judge.
In this case brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 2671, et seq., plaintiffs James and Helen Hardi-man bring claims against the United States arising from treatment Mr. Hardiman received at the Veterans Administration Hospital in Manchester, New Hampshire. Mr. Hardiman’s negligence claim is contained in Count I, and Count II sets forth Mrs. Hardiman’s loss of consortium claim. The matter is before the Court on the United States’ renewed motion to dismiss Count II for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Rule 12(b)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P.
Defendant’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Freddie L. Johnson and Clara Johnson, Husband and Wife, and Cross v. United States of America, and Cross-Appellee v. Timothy B. Hay, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- LaBonte v. National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- Avis E. Swift, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Van Fossen v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1977
- Reid v. Spadone Machine Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Miller v. CBC Companies, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995
- Rode v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Loper v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
- Emery v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996
- HORNOF v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICADistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.