Legal Opinion
Richter v. Ramistain Systems
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 18, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
Claimant sustained a compensable injury in January 2000, for which the claim was accepted and benefits were paid by his employer and its workers’ compensation carrier, Zurich American Insurance Company. In July 2000, claimant initiated a third-party action against GAP, Inc. and Clayco Construction Company, Inc., parties for which Zurich also served as the liability carrier.
In November 2001, representatives of the parties to the third-party action held a conference that resulted in a settlement that included an $800,000 payment to claimant and waiver of Zurich’s recoverable workers’…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brisson v. County of OnondagaNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Hilton v. Truss Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Claim of Hilton v. Truss Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Claim of Illaqua v. Barr-Llewellyn Buick Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Claim of Burton v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jamal v. GohelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Claim of Tamara v. Airborne Express, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Claim of Tamara v. Airborne Express, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012