Legal Opinion

Blanford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 2, 2001No. 5D00-3392PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PLEUS, J.

Kenneth Blanford filed a motion for rehearing after we affirmed per curiam the summary denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence. Because this court is receiving an avalanche of appeals on denials of Rule 3.800(a) motions, we deem it appropriate to use this opportunity to discuss the well-established law and the distinction between Rule 3.800(a) and Rule 3.850 in the hopes it will deter other pro se defendants from asserting similar fruitless arguments.

On May 28, 1998, Blanford was convicted of battery on a law enforcement officer, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rollinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Gray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Palmore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API