Legal Opinion

Rollinson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 29, 1999No. 98-0631PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Per curiam

Kevin Rollinson appeals his sentence imposed pursuant to section 775.082(8), Florida Statutes (1997), the “Prison Releasee Reoffender Act” (“Act”), after his conviction for burglary of a structure (Count I), grand theft (Count II), and battery on a law enforcement officer (Count III). He asserts that the Act is facially unconstitutional on numerous grounds.

I

BACKGROUND

Section 775.082(8)(a)l. of the Act1 provides:

“Prison releasee reoffender” means any defendant who commits, or attempts to commit ... [a]ny felony that involves the use or threat of physical force or violence against an individual…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. LaBonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. CottonSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Chambers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. Peters v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Durr v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API