Legal Opinion

Barros v. Barros

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 9, 1980No. 3810-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReed, C.J.

—Anna Marie Barros appeals from an order correcting a divorce decree nunc pro tunc. We agree with her contentions and reverse.

John Barros initiated an action to divorce Anna Marie Barros in June 1972. The parties stipulated to a complete list of all community assets; among the items included was John's military pension fund. In his oral memorandum opinion, the trial judge stated that the military pension was to be awarded to John; however, neither the findings of fact nor written divorce decree makes any mention of the pension.

After the entry of the divorce decree, John married Rita Barros.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. Mary StuartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
  3. Merry Queen Transfer Corp. v. O'RourkeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
  4. Payne v. PayneWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Dwyer v. NolanWashington Supreme Court · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of PrattWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Kent v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  3. Barros v. BarrosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  4. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API