Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Axelsen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 13, 2001PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), entered May 10, 2000, as, upon the denial of her motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 made at the close of evidence for judgment in her favor as a matter of law, and, upon a jury verdict finding her 50% at fault in the happening of the accident and the defendant 50% at fault, and awarding her, inter alia, $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $0 for future pain and suffering, is in her favor and against the defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Niemiec v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Colonna v. SuarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Sescila v. GarineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Maschka v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Klopchin v. MasriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Chepel v. MeyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Gaeta v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Balducci v. VelasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Carhuayano v. J&R HackingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API