Legal Opinion

Newell v. Douglas Oil & Fertilizer Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 26, 1916No. 7001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Complaint; from city court of Hazlehurst — Judge Grant. August 20, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, J.

1. Suit was brought on two notes, given for commercial fertilizer of brands therein mentioned, and reciting that the maker of the notes acknowledged that at the time of the delivery to him of the fertilizer each sack thereof bore the manufacturer’s guaranteed analysis of its contents, and also the inspector’s tag, and that in all respects the laws of the State had been complied with, and that the sellers of the fertilizer had neither impliedly nor expressly warranted its effect on the crops of the purchaser, and that he agreed that he would not hold the “said Douglas Oil & Fertilizer Company…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Branson v. Piedmont Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Myers v. Douglas Oil & Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API