Legal Opinion

Myers v. Douglas Oil & Fertilizer Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 26, 1916No. 7005Published

Complaint; from city couTt of Hazlehurst — Judge Grant. September 20, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtBboxles, J.

1. The defendant’s plea that the fertilizer for which her note was given was bought for her husband, and that she could not be held liable on the note, as it was an assumption of her husband’s debt, presented an issue of fact, which was passed upon by the jury and resolved against her; and there was ample evidence to support their finding upon this issue.

2. The other questions in this ease are controlled by the decision of this court in Newell v. Douglas Oil & Fertiliser Co., ante, 172 (88 S. E. 1009). Under that decision the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to certain paragraphs…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Newell v. Douglas Oil & Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API