Legal Opinion

Tackett v. State Farm Fire & Casualty

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 20, 1988PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

POPPITI, Judge.

The matter is presently before the Court on plaintiffs Motion to Compel Document Production pursuant to Superior Court Civil Rule 37(a)(2).

This is an action against State Farm Fire and Casualty (“State Farm”) sounding in tort wherein the plaintiffs claim, in substance, that State Farm acted in bad faith in refusing to honor plaintiffs’ claim for policy limits under the under-insured motorist provisions of an insurance policy. State Farm, inter alia, denies any bad faith on its part and alleges an affirmative defense that plaintiff Billie Tackett failed “to supply adequate…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
  2. Brown v. Superior Court in & for Maricopa Cy.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. The Duplan Corporation v. Moulinage Et Retorderie De Chavanoz, Deering Milliken, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  4. United Services Automobile Association v. WerleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. APL Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tackett v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  2. Nicholas v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2006
  3. State ex rel. Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Co. v. MazzoneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Ring v. Commercial Union InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1995
  5. In re RinehardtSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API