Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 24, 1998No. 93, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Judge.

The sole issue in this case is whether a trial court’s communication, in violation of Maryland Rule 4-326(c) 1 with the jury during a stage of trial, the defendant’s right to be present not having been waived in accordance with Rule 4-231, 2 is harm less error. The Circuit Court for Baltimore City found that it was and the Court of Special Appeals affirmed in an unreported opinion. We granted certiorari to address the issue. For the reasons that follow, we shall reverse.

I

The facts pertinent to the resolution of this case are not in dispute. Lisa Taylor, the petitioner, was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Midgett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Parren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. Maurer v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1870

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Winder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Denicolis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Miles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Nicolas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Perez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API