Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Wyoming Game & Fish Commission

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1999No. 97-182PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The sole issue in this appeal evolves out of the contention that a-Wyoming Game and Fish warden, serving as a Bear Management Officer, was a peace officer so as to invoke the waiver provision found in Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-39-112 (Lexis 1999) of the Wyoming Governmental Claims Act pertaining to peace officers. Clayton E. Peterson, Jr. and Tanya Peterson (the Petersons) seek to recover for Mr. Peterson’s injuries when he was mauled by a bear that was the subject of bear management activities of the Wyoming Game and Fish Commission (Game and Fish), which the Petersons contend were…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Motor Vehicle Division v. HoltzWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State Department of Revenue & Taxation v. PacificorpWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Bryant v. HornbuckleWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Nowotny v. L & B Contract Industries, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Thomas Ex Rel. Thomas v. South Cheyenne Water & Sewer DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fontaine v. Board of County Com'rs of Park CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Billings v. Wyoming Board of Outfitters & GuidesWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Thunderbasin Land, Livestock & Investment Co. v. County of Laramie CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. RT Communications, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Christopher D. Balderson v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API