Legal Opinion
AAMCO Transmissions, LLC v. Up To Parr, LLC
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 25, 2023No. 8:22-cv-03212Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC, * Plaintiff, * v. * Civil Action No. 22-3212-PJM UP TO PARR, LLC, et al, % Defendants. , MEMORANDUM OPINION _ Following the Court’s entry of a default judgment against Defendants Carlos Parr and Up to Parr, LLC (“UTP”), Plaintiff AAMCO Transmissions, LLC (““AAMCO”) filed a Motion for Attorney’s Fees (ECF No. 25) with supporting documentation (ECF No. 27). Neither Parr nor UTP have filed an opposition to AAMCO’s Motion. For the reasons explained below, the Court GRANTS AAMCO’s Motion but reduces the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Eileen McAfee v. Christine BoczarCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products v. Von Drehle CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- VeriSign, Inc. v. XYZ.COM LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Corral v. Montgomery CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.