Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Leach v. Redick

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1959No. 35728Published

1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.

The first ground upon which respondent relies in support of his demurrer is that the ordinance in question fails to comply or show compliance with the Ohio statutes requiring competitive bidding for a sale or lease of real property owned by a municipal corporation.

Section 1 of the Columbus Charter reads in part as follows:

“ * * * the city * * * * shall have all powers that now are, or hereafter may be granted to municipalities by the Constitution or laws of Ohio; and all such powers whether expressed or implied, shall be exercised and enforced in the manner prescribed by this charter, or when…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Cincinnati v. CorrellOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. GuentherSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Hugger v. City of IrontonOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Village of Brewster v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Fullwood v. City of CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API