Legal Opinion

Hugger v. City of Ironton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 12, 1947No. 765PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMetcalf, J.

The city of Ironton, having a “city-manager plan” of government, by ordinance duly adopted, sold, executed and delivered to the United' States Department of Agriculture, Forestry Service,, an 8.4-acre tract of unimproved land for the nominal sum of $10. In addition to the consideration mentioned in the deed, it is claimed by the city, as shown by the record, that the purchaser is to furnish fire protection to a large area of forest land adjacent to and ■within the corporate limits of the city. And there is the further consideration that a building is to be erected on the premises sold of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stanley v. SchwalbySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. State Ex Rel. Arey v. SherrillOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Green Ex Rel. City of Columbus v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Northern Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of ParmaOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Greater Fremont, Inc. v. City of FremontDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1968
  3. Cincinnati & Suburban Bell Telephone Co. v. City of CincinnatiHamilton County Probate Court · 1964
  4. Beal v. City of ElyriaLorain County Court of Common Pleas · 1971
  5. Lynn Martin, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Cooper Electric Supply Co., a Corporation, and Richard A. Cooper, Individually v. National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors, and National Association of Electrical Distributors, Amicus-Appellants. Lynn Martin, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Cooper Electric Supply Co., a Corporation, and Richard A. Cooper, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API