Legal Opinion

Amisub of South Carolina, Inc. v. Passmore

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 25, 1994No. 24133PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Justice:

This appeal is from a family court order finding appellants financially responsible for appellant Carl Passmore’s wife. We reverse.

FACTS

In April 1992, fifty-seven-year-old Beatrice Passmore was admitted to Piedmont Medical Center (Hospital). Mrs. Pass-more had been on a ventilator for two years and cared for by Mr. Passmore and her granddaughter. Mrs. Passmore was not mentally incapacitated. At the end of April 1992, although still on a ventilator, Mrs. Passmore was well enough to be released from the hospital. However, Mr. Passmore refused to accept responsibility for her care…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  2. Richland Memorial Hospital v. BurtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Anderson Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. HagenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Eagle Container Co. Ex Rel. Estate of Spotts v. County of NewberryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Pitman v. Republic Leasing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Riggs v. RiggsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  4. Johnson v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, & Pardon ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Town of Hilton Head Island v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API