Legal Opinion
Washington Scientific Industries, Inc. v. Polan Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 10, 1969No. 4-67 Civ. 43PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MILES W. LORD, District Judge.
Sidney Aluminum Products, one of the third-party defendants in this lawsuit, seeks an order dismissing the third-party complaint on the grounds that this Court lacks personal jurisdiction over it. Although the controversy involved in this lawsuit could be more efficiently resolved in one action, this Court cannot proceed to determine what, if any, are the rights and obligations of a party unless the relevant statutory and constitutional standards for obtaining personal jurisdiction over that party are met. In this instance, the Court holds that it has no…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bork v. MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Collyard v. Washington CapitalsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
- Conwed Corporation v. NORTENE, SADistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1975
- Independent School District No. 454 v. Marshall & Stevens Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1971
- Thompson v. KiekhaeferDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.