Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Ludden v. Barton

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1911No. 16,821Published

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Albert J. Cornish, Judge.

1DissentLetton, J.

While I agree with what is said in the opinion with respect to the value of the services rendered by the relator, I must dissent from the conclusion that a plain disregard by an officer of the state of the provisions of a statute, if continued for a long period of time, may mala1 that lawful which by express terms is prohibited, and thus defeat the legislative purpose. Neither can I agree that where the members of a board are expressly prohibited from receiving compensation as such members, and the secretary is required by the statute to be a member of tlx1 board, the statute may be evaded by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Whittemore v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. United States v. BrindleSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. City of Decatur v. VermillionIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Troup v. Morgan CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. SilverNebraska Supreme Court · 1879

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API