Legal Opinion

Ruppel v. City of Valley Park

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 2010No. ED 93719PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Roxanne Ruppel (Ruppel) appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Valley Park (the City) on Ruppel’s petition alleging that the City discriminated against her because of her sex when it terminated her employment, in violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA), Section 213.055 1 . We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Factual and Procedural History

The record in this case, viewed in the light most favorable to Ruppel, the party against whom summary judgment was entered, 2 establishes the following facts:

In January 2002, Ruppel began…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Todd Ex Rel. Todd v. Missouri United School Insurance CouncilSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  3. Daugherty v. City of Maryland HeightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  4. Buchheit, Inc. v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Stanley v. JerDen Foods, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. Holmes v. Kansas City Missouri Board of Police CommissionersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Harold Lampley and Rene Frost v. The Missouri Commission on Human Rights and Alisa WarrenSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
  3. Ressler v. Clay CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Carter v. CSL Plasma Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2014
  5. Kinsky v. 154 Land Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API