Legal Opinion · Dissent

Amalgamated Transit Union v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 11, 1990Published

1DissentEllerin, J.

We agree with the majority that this matter, involving questions of statutory construction and possible Federal preemption, should be disposed of, on the merits, by way of an expedited appeal. However, contrary to the position taken by the majority, we would not stay the temporary restraining order issued by the trial court since we find that a sufficient showing was made of the employment of strikebreakers and acts of violence to warrant the issuance of *171the temporary order prohibiting the defendants from engaging in the unlawful conduct proscribed by Administrative Code of the City of New…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kay-Fries, Inc. v. MartinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Jou-Jou Designs, Inc. v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Local 23-25Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Jou-Jou Designs, Inc. v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Local 23-25New York Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API