Kuhnhausen v. Woodbeck
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentBlake, C. J.
(dissenting)—Upon the facts of the case, the instruction complained of was the equivalent of a directed verdict for the defendants. Plaintiff was crossing at an intersection on a course approximating the sidewalk area extended. She looked before starting across and saw no vehicle approaching.
This court has repeatedly held, upon similar facts, that it is for the jury—not the court—to say whether an injured person is guilty of contributory negligence in proceeding without looking again. Hillebrant v. Manz, 71 Wash. 250, 128 Pac. 892; Chase v. Seattle Taxicab & Transfer Co., 78 Wash. 537, 139…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hillebrant v. ManzWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Olsen v. Peerless LaundryWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Chase v. Seattle Taxicab & Transeer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Redick v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Hiteshue v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1932