Legal Opinion

Matter of Richmond

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 20, 1988No. C2-88-2009Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

Michael Richmond appeals from both a judgment of commitment and a judgment continuing his commitment as a mentally ill and dangerous person. We affirm the trial court’s decision that Richmond is mentally ill, but reverse the court’s continuation of Richmond’s commitment as mentally ill and dangerous to the public.

FACTS

In early 1988, Richmond became involved in several incidents with the police. During April and May 1988, Richard made numerous telephone calls to the Brooklyn Park Police Department, voicing vague complaints. He made no threats during these calls. In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re MollCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Matter of PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Matter of MinerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Matter of NiskanenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API