Legal Opinion

Brinn v. Bull Insular Lines, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 1961No. Civ. A. Nos. 25346, 27338PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, Judge.

We have been asked to amend our pretrial order of September 28, 1961, wherein it was provided inter alia,:

“4. All parties agreed that liability is admitted and the case is to be tried on the issue of the responsible party * * *”

A brief discussion of the problem appears to be warranted although the extensive motions, arguments, and correspondence have far exceeded the importance of the issue involved and is another example of the time the Court must waste on trivial objections by counsel, particularly in maritime cases.

When respective counsel appeared before us at the pre-trial…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978
  2. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1979
  3. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1965
  4. Life Music, Inc. v. Honorable David N. Edelstein, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. Robert Lassiter v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API