Cordero v. Doe

123 Today the majority concludes that initiative and referendum statutes preclude the substitution of a proposed initiative's designated representative. The majority does not rely on any statutory provision that expressly prohibits substitution-indeed, no such provision exists. Instead, the majority concludes that because section 1-40-106(4)(d), CRS. (2018), permits the Title Board to postpone consideration of a proposed initiative when the designated representative fails to appear at a Title Board meeting, the legislature intended to foreclose any substitution of a designated representative.…