Legal Opinion

Petrofesa v. Denver & Rio Grande Western R.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1946No. 6900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonough, justice.

The jury awarded plaintiffs damages for loss of crops during 1943 resulting from alleged blocking of an irrigation ditch on the railroad right-of-way, and defendants appeal.

There was testimony from plaintiff and others that for over 25 years the land purchased by plaintiffs in April 1943 had been irrigated by water from the Boardman Springs, which was conducted to this land through ditches extending from said springs to the railroad right-of-way, and along the easterly side of said right-of-way for some distance, and then going westerly underneath the tracks to the land of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Naylor v. FloorUtah Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Sharp v. GianulakisUtah Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Himonas v. Denver & R. G. W. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  2. Hatch v. BastianUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Pollei v. BurgerUtah Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Peay v. B & N Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API