Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

D.E. v. John Doe

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 25, 2016No. 15-2128Published

1Concurring in the judgmentDamon J. Keith, Circuit Judge

I cannot join the majority’s interpretation of the Fourth Amendment. In holding that Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) officers may, without reasonable suspicion, search individuals who are not in the process of crossing an international border, the majority stretches the “border search” exception to its breaking point.

A. Application of the Border Search Exception Must be Tethered to the Primary Purpose of the Exception

“A search without a warrant is ‘per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.’ ” United…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. United States v. RamseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. German Espinoza Montero-Camargo, United States of America v. Lorenzo Sanchez-GuillenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Denise Coley v. Lucas County, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API