Matter of Futuronics Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, District Judge:
Attorneys are officers of the court and must conduct themselves accordingly. They are professionals and, as such, are to be held to a higher standard in the discharge of their duties in this regard. Arlan’s Department Stores, Inc., 615 F.2d 925 (2d Cir. 1979). This is especially true in the context of a Chapter XI proceeding where the debtor’s counsel acts as a fiduciary. Id. at 932-33. The court must necessarily rely extensively upon the integrity of debtor’s counsel in the handling and administration of a debtor’s assets. However, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wayne United Gas Co. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Weil v. NearySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- In the Matter of Arlan's Department Stores, Inc., DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- In Re Texlon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- The Official Creditors' Committee of Fox Markets, Inc. v. Walter Ely and Stuart L. KadisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Wilson Foods Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1984
- Hunter Sav. Ass'n v. Baggott Law Offices Co., LPADistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
- In Re Willamette Timber Systems, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1985
- Matter of Aminex Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- In Re Den-Col Cartage & Distribution, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.