Legal Opinion

People v. Montano

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 9, 2006No. 2-04-0103PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Byrne

Following an evidentiary hearing, defendant, Aurelio Montano, appeals from the denial of his petition under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (Act) (725 ILCS 5/122 — 1 et seq. (West 2000)). Defendant, a Mexican national, argues on appeal that he was denied his constitutional right to due process because he was not advised of his right to communicate with consular officials of Mexico upon arrest as guaranteed by the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, opened for signature April 24, 1963, art. 36, 21 U.S.T. 77, 596 U.N.T.S. 261 (Vienna Convention). Defendant claims that such a right is an…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Breard v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. Harvey E. Page (99-5361) Thomas Andre Powers (99-5449) Keith Linton (99-5451) David Shawn Hill (99-5456)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Chucks EmuegbunamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. BeamanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  2. People v. NajeraAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. People v. BeamanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  4. People v. BeamanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. People v. NajeraAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API