Legal Opinion
State v. Geise
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 23, 2002No. NonePublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KONÉNKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Daniel Geise, Roland Clausen and David Clausen were convicted of violating South Dakota’s motor vehicle overweight statutes and were assessed civil penalties. They appeal on multiple issues, challenging the constitutionality and applicability of the provisions of SDCL ch. 32-22. We affirm.
Background
[¶ 2.] On December 28, 1999, Clausen Construction was returning three Caterpillar Model 627 scrapers from a construction site near South Shore in Codington County to Clark, South Dakota. Traveling in a convoy, Daniel Geise was operating a tractor-trailer combination, which…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Myrl & Roy's Paving, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. ArmstrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. TurnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
- State v. JohnsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Jah-I-Dah Gumbs v. Schneider Regional Medical Center, Maria C. Juelle, P.A.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2020