State v. Myrl & Roy's Paving, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] After a driver was stopped and charged for operating an overweight vehicle in violation of various provisions of SDCL Chapter 32-22, the State brought charges against Myrl & Roy’s Paving, Inc. (Myrl & Roy’s) as owner of the vehicle. A magistrate found Myrl & Roy’s guilty on five counts of violating SDCL 32-22-16 and one count of violating SDCL 32-22-52. The magistrate further imposed a civil penalty pursuant to SDCL 32-22-55. The circuit court affirmed the magistrate’s judgment, and Myrl & Roy’s now appeals. Affirmed.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶ 2.] Myrl & Roy’s is a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. DillonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Zoss v. SchaefersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Satellite Cable Services, Inc. v. Northern Electric Cooperative, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Sanford v. SanfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Gloe v. Union Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Lewis & Clark Rural Water System, Inc. v. SeebaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. ArmstrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. AsmussenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.