Legal Opinion

State v. Myrl & Roy's Paving, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 2004No. NonePublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] After a driver was stopped and charged for operating an overweight vehicle in violation of various provisions of SDCL Chapter 32-22, the State brought charges against Myrl & Roy’s Paving, Inc. (Myrl & Roy’s) as owner of the vehicle. A magistrate found Myrl & Roy’s guilty on five counts of violating SDCL 32-22-16 and one count of violating SDCL 32-22-52. The magistrate further imposed a civil penalty pursuant to SDCL 32-22-55. The circuit court affirmed the magistrate’s judgment, and Myrl & Roy’s now appeals. Affirmed.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2.] Myrl & Roy’s is a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. DillonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Zoss v. SchaefersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Satellite Cable Services, Inc. v. Northern Electric Cooperative, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Sanford v. SanfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Gloe v. Union Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Lewis & Clark Rural Water System, Inc. v. SeebaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. ArmstrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. AsmussenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API