Legal Opinion
2300, INC. v. City of Arlington, Tex.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 22, 1994No. 2-94-00135-CVPublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HICKS, Justice.
Appeal was taken from the trial court’s denial of a temporary injunction against the City of Arlington. 2300, Inc. d/b/a 2300 Club and Centerfold, Inc. d/b/a La Bare (“appellants”) challenge the constitutionality of the City of Arlington Ordinance No. 92-117 Sections 5.01(A) and (B) entitled “Additional Regulations for Adult Cabaret” (the “no touch” provisions). The trial court found the “no touch” provisions constitutional as enacted. In two points of error, appellants allege error by the trial court in denying the temporary injunction.
We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Appellants are…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Miller Paper Co. v. Roberts Paper Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
- Hang On, Inc. v. City of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Letson v. Barnes, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
- Crawford v. Hope, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
- N.W. Enterprises, Inc. v. City of HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.