Legal Opinion

King v. Jefferson City School Board

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1880PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Cole Circuit Court. — Hon. E. L. Edwards, Judge. cited Sewell v. Board of Education, 29 Ohio St. 89; Spiller v. Woburn, 12 Allen 127; Burdick v. Babcock, 81 Iowa 562; Ferriter v. Tyler, 48 Vt. 444; Stephenson o. Hall, 14 Barb. 22á; Britt v. Snodgrass, 66 Mo. 286. cited Ex parte Frank, 52 Cal. 606; s. c., 7 Cent. Law Jour. 16; State ex rel. Kennedy x.-Union Merch. Exchange, 2 Mo. App. 96; s. e., 8 Cent. Law Jour. 290.

1Opinion of the CourtNapton, J.

The only question in this case is whether rule 11, adopted and enforced by the board of the Jefferson City school district, in the case of the plaintiff’s son, is a-legal one. The question arose on a demurrer to defendant’s answer, which set up a breach of this rule by plaintiff’s son as a justification for his suspension. The circuit court sustained the demurrer. The rule is as follows : “Any pupil absent six half days in four consecutive weeks, without satisfactory excuse, shall be suspended from school.” The statute provides, (R. S. 1879, §7045,) that “the board shall have the power to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dritt v. SnodgrassSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kinzer v. Directors of Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Mahanoy Area School Dist. v. B. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
  3. In re RebenackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Board of Education v. PurseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Deskins v. GoseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API