Legal Opinion

Bragg v. Bamberger

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1864PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Randolph Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the Court

Ray, Ch. J.

Bamberger, Wright Co. brought an action against Bragg $ Clark -upon the following agreement:

“Messrs. Bamberger, Wright $ Co., Dayton, Ohio—You will please forward to me one of your combined reapers and mowers, to be shipped by the 15th day of June, 1862, directed to Bragg <J* Clark, at Union City, in the county of Randolph and state of Indiana, in care of-. At the arrival of the machine at the above-named place, I agree to receive it immediately, pay freight and charges, and test it at commencement of harvest, and if found to ■work as per your warranty, (printed below,) I agree to…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. C. Callahan Co. v. Wall Rice Milling Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. King v. Edward Thompson Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Scudder v. HartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API