Legal Opinion

United States v. Georgina Porath

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 6, 2012No. 11-1428UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.

Defendants-appellants Georgina Porath and Gordon Porath appeal from the district court’s judgment following a one-day bench trial. The district court found that the United States was entitled to attach a federal tax lien to Mr. Porath’s interest in one-half of the property in order to satisfy his unpaid tax obligations. The Poraths argue that the district court erred by (1) concluding that a 1987 postnuptial agreement between the Poraths did not demonstrate a present intent to convey Mr. Po-rath’s interest in the marital home to Mrs. Porath and (2)…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SternSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Peggy Ann Schaefer Spotts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. Drye v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. City of Grosse Pointe Park v. Michigan Municipal Liability & Property PoolMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Andrews v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. LongDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
  2. United States of America v. Don Kramer and Oakland County TreasurerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
  3. United States v. HollandDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  4. United States v. SzostakDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API