Legal Opinion
United States v. Holland
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 13, 2020No. 2:13-cv-10082Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Case No. 13-10082 vs. HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH EDWARD J. HOLLAND, JR., et al., Defendants. ________________________________/ OPINION & ORDER (1) GRANTING THE GOVERNMENT’S AND THE HOLLAND PARTIES’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PATMON AND YOUNG (Dkts. 361, 363); (2) DENYING PATMON AND YOUNG’S JOINT MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS (Dkt. 370); AND (3) DENYING AS MOOT THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO APPOINT A RECEIVER (Dkt. 362) This matter is before the Court for determination of the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.