Legal Opinion

Castle & Cooke, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 8, 1972No. C.D. 4339PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Watson, Judge:

Defendant has moved for summary judgment in this action pursuant to Rules 4.12 and 8.2 of the rules of this court. The merchandise involved is described in the invoice papers as “3 Speed Statok eoe Sugar. Centrifugal, MotoR” and was classified pursuant to item 682.60 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as modified by T.D. 68-9, providing for other electrical motors and parts thereof, dutiable at the rate of 12 per centum ad valorem.1 Plaintiff claims classification pursuant to item 666.20, free of duty as parts of machinery for use in the manufacture of sugar.

In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  2. Liebert v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. American Customs Brokg. Co., Inc., A/c Hamakua Mill Co. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  5. Great Western Sugar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pollard Bearings Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  2. Altieri v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API